679 So. 2d 314 - Rafael v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 2017
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miller v. Gentry · Coney v. State · 413 So. 2d 1175 - Francis v. State · 638 So. 2d 1024 - Bradshaw v. State · Nguyen v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“DOES THE DECISION IN CONEY V. STATE, 653 So.2d 1009 (Fla.), cert, denied, — U.S. —, 116 S.Ct. 315 , 133 L.Ed.2d 218 (1995), APPLY TO “PIPELINE CASES,” THAT IS, THOSE OF SIMILARLY SITUATED DEFENDANTS WHOSE CASES WERE PENDING ON DIRECT REVIEW OR OTHERWISE NOT YET FINAL WHEN THE OPINION WAS RELEASED?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.