Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 679 So. 2d 340 - Bowers v. State

679 So. 2d 340 - Bowers v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
February 2014
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently February 2014

13 state decisions

60199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Black v. State · Rhoden v. State · 622 So. 2d 1151 - Palag v. State · Elmy v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he [home-invasion robbery] statute clearly contemplates a single entry into a dwelling and the ensuing robbery of one or more occupants. Accordingly, only one count of home-invasion robbery properly could be charged.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Only one count of home-invasion robbery may properly be charged for the entry into a single dwelling occupied by its two owners. . . . Although several victims were in the home, [the defendant] entered only one home during this crime. Thus, [the defendant] may be punished only once.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “`Home-invasion robbery' means any robbery that occurs when the offender enters a dwelling with the intent to commit a robbery, and does commit a robbery of the occupants therein.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.