Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

679 So. 2d 362

Docket No. 96-2351.

Godwin v. State

Tess L. GODWIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 12, 1996.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1996-09-12

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 2011

4 state decisions

Relies on Davis v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-09-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Tess L. Godwin, Lowell, pro se.

¶2No Appearance for Appellee.

¶3*363 PER CURIAM.

¶4Defendant appeals the summary denial of her 3.800 motion to correct sentence. Defendant asserts in the 3.800 motion that the trial court entered a departure sentence without providing written reasons. This sentencing error must be raised on direct appeal, and it is not cognizable in a post-conviction motion. See Davis v. State, 661 So.2d 1193 (Fla.1995).

¶5AFFIRMED.

¶6COBB, GOSHORN and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

/679/so2d/362 · .json · Public domain