Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

679 So. 2d 367

Brown v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 18, 1996

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1996-09-18

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 2016

2 state decisions

Relies on 618 So. 2d 734 - Biller v. State · Fernandez v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-09-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm both conditions of probation except for that portion of condition eleven (11) that requires random alcohol testing, which we reverse and remand with direction to strike same.

¶2This requirement fails to be reasonably related to the rehabilitation of appellant, bears no relationship to the crime for which appellant was convicted, and relates to conduct that is otherwise legal. See Biller v. State, 618 So.2d 734 (Fla.1993); Fernandez v. State, 677 So.2d 332 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

GLICKSTEIN, WARNER and GROSS, JJ., concur.
/679/so2d/367 · .json · Public domain