¶1We affirm a temporary order modifying custody. On the record before the court, we find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s concluding, after fourteen hours of hearing, that it was in the best interest of the child to reside temporarily with the father. As to all issues raised, there is sufficient evidence to support this exercise of discretion. We note that there is no question here that Appellant had sufficient notice and ample opportunity to be heard.
679 So. 2d 57
Hernandez v. Hernandez
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 4, 1996
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1996-09-04
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 2012
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1996-09-04
View the full empirical analysis of this case →