Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 679 So. 2d 617 - Simon v. State

679 So. 2d 617 - Simon v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
June 2006
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Hernandez v. New York · Powers v. Ohio · JEB v. Alabama Ex Rel. TB · 451 So. 2d 743 - Neal v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the numbers of which gender were excused versus the numbers of the two sexes which were seated on the panel, is the type of analysis a trial court conducts in order to determine whether a prima facie inference of discrimination has been made.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he trial judge's finding in the context under consideration here largely will turn on evaluation of credibility, a reviewing court should ordinarily give those findings great deference.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “So long as the trial court applies the correct legal standard, we will not overturn a finding of fact made by a trial judge unless it is clearly erroneous.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.