M.T.C. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 6, 1996

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1996-09-06

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently January 2000

5 state decisions

Relies on Anders v. California · Green v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-09-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm M.T.C.’s adjudication and disposition. However, in so doing, we strike the imposition of the public defender’s fee because the court failed to apprise the juvenile or his parents of their right to contest the amount as required by rule 3.720(d)(1), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. On remand, the fee may be reimposed upon compliance with the rule. *68See, e.g., Green v. State, 650 So.2d 635 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).

¶2AFFIRMED in part; REMANDED.

PETERSON, C.J., and COBB and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.

¶3. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).