679 So. 2d 710 - Pope v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
84 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 84 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably 743 So. 2d 1 - Ruiz v. State (1999), Gudinas v. State (1997)
84 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Soberon v. United States · Needler v. Valley National Bank of Arizona · Proffitt v. Florida · 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · New Jersey v. New York
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The test for admissibility of photographic evidence is relevancy rather than necessity.”
12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[r]elevant evidence which is not so shocking as to outweigh its probative value is admissible.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[Assuming someone takes the stand and they’re testifying and they admit to using alcohol and maybe using a lot of alcohol, or there’s testimony about someone having used alcohol, would you just sort of automatically become prejudiced towards that person to the point that you would form an opinion about their truthfulness or their guilt or anything of that nature?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.