679 So. 2d 74 - Widom v. Widom’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 632 So. 2d 130 - Winkelman v. Toll · 565 So. 2d 914 - Sandstrom v. Sandstrom · 667 So. 2d 988 - Easley, McCaleb & Stallings, Ltd. v. Gibbons · 641 So. 2d 493 - Rosasco v. Rosasco · Marshall v. Marshall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When an order setting the fee amount is entered after the notice of appeal is filed, but prior to a determination of the main appeal, the notice of appeal from the final judgment of dissolution matures and vests the appellate court with jurisdiction to review the entitlement issue. . . . We therefore have jurisdiction to review the final judgment of dissolution determining the former wife's entitlement to her attorney's fees and affirm that award. We do not have jurisdiction to review the amount awarded where the amount was not determined in the final judgment of dissolution and no notice of appeal was filed from the order setting the award amount.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[a]n attorney's fee award does not become final and ripe for review until the amount is set”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.