Thornton v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 2000
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Appellant was not charged with any violation under section 775.087 or 775.0823, nor was he charged under 893.135; therefore he could not have been sentenced using a law enforcement multiplier.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Matthews v. State“If the primary offense is a violation of § 775.0823(3), (4), (5), (6), (7), or (8), the subtotal sentence points are multiplied by 2.0.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“aggravated assault on a law enforcement officer.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Matthews v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.