Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 679 S.W.2d 576 - Brown & Root, Inc. v. Rust Engineering

Brown & Root, Inc. v. Rust Engineering’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
August 1999
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Louisiana · Cipriano v. City of Houma · City of San Antonio v. Talerico · Hunter v. Fort Worth Capital Corp. · Ackermann v. Vordenbaum

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In the Talerico case, the court held that the strict rules of the common law precluded the City of San Antonio from bringing into the lawsuit any other party, or from maintaining an independent lawsuit against another party, until the suit against the city terminated by judgment or until the city paid damages. Under today's procedures Brown & Root was at liberty to claim against and bring into this suit Rust and Salvucci at any time.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “we perceive no need to distinguish differences in those cases in which no cause of action ever existed and those cases in which the cause of action was barred by limitations”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.