Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 679 SW2D 586 - Guidroz v. State

Guidroz v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 1988
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 187th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Greene v. Massey · Todd v. State · Gevinson v. Manhattan Construction Co. of Oklahoma

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “expert testimony, even if uncontradicted, does not establish insanity as a matter of law. Such unrebutted testimony only raises an issue of fact to be resolved by the trier of fact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “all of the evidence known to the State and all doctors report”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.