State v. Marcus Huffman’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Gaspar · State v. Castore · DeCiantis v. State · State v. Cassey · State v. Garcia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]hen evidence ⅜ * * may nonetheless be helpful to [the] defendant's effective cross-examination of a witness, a defendant’s -right to that evidence arises from the right of confrontation, and thus becomes an issue ‘only when a defendant is improperly denied the ability to confront and to effectively cross-examine an adverse witness at trial,’”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“it did not address-either directly or indirectly-the credibility or truthfulness of other fact witnesses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“But the state's discovery obligations extend beyond the literal language of Rule 16 * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.