Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 68 Ariz. 139 - Brown v. Beck

Brown v. Beck’s Empirical Analysis

1949

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
December 2011
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently December 2011

12 state decisions

6019491950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on James Mack Co. v. Bear River Milling Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The law is that one cannot declare on an express contract and recover on quantum meruit.” Brown v. Beck, 68 Ariz. 139 at 143 , 202 P.2d 528 at 530 (1949).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.