In Re Lane’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently April 2011
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 502
Relies on Bittner v. Borne Chemical Co. · Gurmankin v. Costanzo · In Re Nova Real Estate Investment Trust · Matter of Pizza of Hawaii, Inc. · In the Matter of William Rakestraw Co., Inc., Bankrupt. Marin Foods, Inc. v. Walter J. Hempy, Trustee in Bankruptcy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) any contingent or unliquidated claim, the fixing or liquidation of which, as the case may be, would unduly delay the administration of the case.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.