Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

68 Cal. 133

Graves v. Baker

California Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1885

California Supreme Court · decided 1885-11-30

<p>Trust Deed — Homestead — Evidence. — In an action to declare a trust under the provisions of a deed from a husband to his wife of property on which a homestead had been previously declared by the wife, the declaration of homestead is admissible in evidence for the purpose of avoiding the deed.</p>

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 1905

2 state decisions

Relies on Ham v. Santa Rosa Bank

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1885-11-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Foote, C.

¶1Action to declare a trust under the provisions of a deed made by Grogan Graves to Miriam Graves, his wife. The trust deed was of property on which a homestead had been declared by Miriam, the wife'of Grogan Graves, before the trust deed was executed and delivered. The declaration of homestead was offered in evidence with a view to defeat this trust deed. It was excluded by the court.

¶2This declaration of homestead has been before this court in the case of Steiner v. Graves et al., No. 5276. And, as we understand, it has been declared valid. (See Ham v. Santa Rosa Bank, 62 Cal. 125.) Therefore, it could only be abandoned by a declaration or a grant *134thereof executed and acknowledged by Grogan Graves and Miriam Graves, his wife. (Sec. 1243, Civ. Code.) The trust deed was executed and acknowledged by Grogan Graves alone, hence as against a valid declaration of homestead it was void. The court below, in refusing to admit in evidence this declaration of homestead, committed error, and its judgment should be reversed.

¶3Searls, C., and Belcher, C. C., concurred.

¶4The Court. — For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion, the judgment is reversed and cause remanded.

/68/cal/133 · .json · Public domain