Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 68 CAL2D 436 - People v. Chimel

People v. Chimel’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

114
cited by 114 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
January 2006
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 105 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 114 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2006 · most notably Chimel v. California (1969), 71 Cal. 2d 1096 - People v. Edwards (1969)

4 federal appellate · 105 state decisions

62019681970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ker v. State of California · 46 Cal. 2d 818 - People v. Watson · Agnello v. United States · Marron v. United States · Giordenello v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 114 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"To invalidate the arrest here solely because the arresting officer first obtained a warrant supported by a constitutionally insufficient complaint would not further the policies of the Fourth Amendment but would subvert its preference for arrest and searches conducted pursuant to warrants." People v. Chimel, 68 Cal.2d 436 , 67 Cal.Rptr. 421 , 439 P.2d 333, 337 (1968).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The legality of an arrest, however, cannot depend exclusively upon the validity of the warrant pursuant to which the arrest is executed since an arrest without a warrant may stand if based on probable cause.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.