Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 68 CAL2D 563 - People v. Flores

People v. Flores’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
1
states following
October 1987
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently October 1987 · most notably 43 Cal. 3d 1104 - People v. Anderson (1987), 43 Cal. 3d 171 - People v. Ledesma (1987)

1 federal appellate · 36 state decisions

200196819701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · Bruton v. United States · Aguilar v. Texas · United States v. Ventresca

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “held that the introduction into evidence of a codefendant's extrajudicial statement which inculpates the defendant violates the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to confront the witnesses against him even though the jury is instructed not to consider the statement as evidence against him.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The officer may break open any outer or inner door or window of a house, or any part of a house, or anything therein, to execute the warrant, if, after notice of his authority and purpose, he is refused admittance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The improper admission into evidence of a codefendant's extrajudicial statement does not automatically require reversal of the defendant's conviction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.