Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 68 CAL2D 810 - People v. Carter

People v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

121
cited by 121 later decisions
9
states following
July 2015
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 109 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 121 later decisions — most recently July 2015 · most notably 42 Cal. 3d 730 - People v. Rodriguez (1986), 19 Cal. 3d 835 - People v. Gainer (1977)

5 federal appellate · 109 state decisions

430196819701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 55 Cal. 2d 328 - People v. Burton · Paulson v. Superior Court · 45 Cal. 2d 590 - People v. Tarantino · People v. Curtis · 232 Cal. App. 2d 650 - People v. Beaugez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 121 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “statutory responsibility of assuring that a verdict is rendered `unless, at the expiration of such time as the court may deem proper, it satisfactorily appears that there is no reasonable probability that the jury can agree.' (Pen. Code, § 1140.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he court must exercise its power ... without coercion of the jury, so as to avoid displacing the jury's independent judgment `in favor of considerations of compromise and expediency.' [Citations]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “peculiarly dependent upon the facts of each case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.