Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 68 CAL2D 854 - In Re Bevill

In Re Bevill’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 40 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2019 · most notably 5 Cal. 4th 750 - In Re Clark (1993), 14 Cal. 3d 306 - People v. Burnick (1975)

1 federal appellate · 40 state decisions

170196819701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Peyton v. Rowe · McNally v. Hill · In Re Dixon · In Re Newbern · 66 Cal. 2d 390 - People v. Merriam

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Habeas corpus is available in cases where the court has acted in excess of its jurisdiction. [Citations.] For purposes of this writ as well as prohibition or certiorari, the term `jurisdiction' is not limited to its fundamental meaning, and in such proceedings judicial acts may be restrained or annulled if determined to be in excess of the court's powers as defined by constitutional provision, statute, or rules developed by courts. [Citations.] In accordance with these principles a defendant is entitled to habeas corpus if there is no material dispute as to the facts relating to his conviction and if it appears that the statute under which he was convicted did not prohibit his conduct. [Citations.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[w]hen the proceedings relating to commitment as a mentally disordered sex offender have run their course, the criminal case may be resumed and sentence imposed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Habeas corpus is appropriate to challenge the validity of a person's commitment or continued confinement as a mentally disordered sex offender,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.