68 Cal. App. 2d 266 - Katz v. Enos’s Empirical Analysis
1945
Citation profile
55 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently January 1986 · most notably 1 Cal. 3d 351 - Conti v. Board of Civil Service Commissioners (1969), 104 Cal. App. 2d 642 - People v. Hess (1951)
55 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Whitlow v. Durst · Steinberger v. Steinberger · Estate of McLellan · Perry v. Magneson · Wheeler v. Bolton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Appellants argue generally in regard to the sufficiency of the evidence that in a case such as this, the deed is presumed to convey absolute title and the burden of proving it did not do so is upon plaintiff and that to overcome this presumption plaintiff’s proof must be ‘clear, satisfactory and convincing.’ However, the courts have repeatedly held that the question as to whether the evidence is ‘clear and convincing’ or sufficient to sustain a judgment for the plaintiff ‘must be determined by the trial court,’ and that the determination of the”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Davidson v. Streeter
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.