Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 68 Cal. App. 3d 372 - Kahn v. Kahn

68 Cal. App. 3d 372 - Kahn v. Kahn’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

75
cited by 75 later decisions
3
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

71 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently December 2015 · most notably 84 Cal. App. 3d 771 - Deyo v. Kilbourne (1978), 81 Cal. App. 4th 377 - Juarez v. Boy Scouts of America, Inc. (2000)

71 state decisions

40019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. Rogers · In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions · Costello v. United States · Hammond Packing Company v. State of Arkansas · 56 Cal. 2d 355 - Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Sections 581, 581a and 581c specify when and under what circumstances a judgment of dismissal shall be with prejudice to the cause. ■ A judgment of dismissal on the ground of failure to comply with orders of the court to make discovery is not among those specifically mentioned. But section 582 provides, “In all other cases judgment shall be rendered on the merits.” If this section is to have any meaning at all, therefore, a judgment of dismissal for noncompliance with discovery orders must come under the statutory command and have the effect of a judgment against the plaintiff on the merits.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the provisions of the same code relating to the same subject matter are to be construed together as one act, as though all were passed at the same time.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.