Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 68 COLO 279 - Clark v. O'Donnell

Clark v. O'Donnell’s Empirical Analysis

1920

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently August 2014

8 state decisions

201920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fillmore v. Wells

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The principal purpose of the statute, as to notice, is to protect innocent purchasers of the fruits of the judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.