Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 68 CONNAPP 194 - State v. Vasquez

State v. Vasquez’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
1
states following
September 2022
most recently cited

43 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently September 2022 · most notably State v. L'Minggio (2002), State v. Holmes (2003)

43 state decisions

390200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pinkerton v. United States · State v. Golding · Doerr v. Doerr · Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Pemberton · Martin v. Delaware

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Therefore, the fact that the defendant was not formally charged as an accessory does not preclude his being convicted as such ... and a defendant who is charged with an offense should be on notice that he may be convicted as an accessory.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “a defendant may be convicted as an accessory even though he was charged only as a principal as long as the evidence presented at trial is sufficient to establish accessorial conduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.