State v. Duteau’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably State v. Hampton (2009), State v. Boyd (2005)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · State v. Golding · Emigrant Savings Bank v. Cam · State v. Bostwick · State v. Heredia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This court shall not be bound to consider a claim unless it was distinctly raised at the trial or arose subsequent to the trial.... Practice Book § 60-5. Appellate review of evidentiary rulings is ordinarily limited to the specific legal issue raised by the objection of trial counsel.... By failing to object ... the defendant failed to preserve this claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“We are not required to review issues that have been improperly presented to this court through an inadequate brief. ... Analysis, rather than mere abstract assertion, is required in order to avoid abandoning an issue by failure to brief the issue properly.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“provide either legal authority or analysis to support this claim”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.