Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 68 CONNAPP 622 - State v. Westberry

State v. Westberry’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

34 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Golding · McGee v. County of Orange · Vig v. United States · State v. Kelly · In Re As

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that can generate the kind of nervous excitement or uncontrolled outbursts captured by the spontaneous utterance exception to the rule against hearsay. 4 At the outset, we appreciate the fact that the unannounced presence of an individual at one's door, in and of itself, may not appear to be among the usual set of circumstances envisioned when evaluating whether a statement is, or is not, admissible as a spontaneous utterance. Although this court has previously suggested that certain events lack the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “made in such close connection to [a startling] occurrence and under such circumstances as to negate the opportunity for deliberation and fabrication ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the application of the exception entails a uniquely fact bound inquiry.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.