Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 68 CONNAPP 879 - State v. Constantopolous

State v. Constantopolous’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

24 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Golding · Cobham v. Commissioner of Correction · State v. McNellis · State v. Cator · Luciani v. Stop & Shop Companies, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he judicial authority may at any time correct an illegal sentence or other illegal disposition, or it may correct a sentence imposed in an illegal manner or any other disposition made in an illegal manner.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[b]oth the trial court and this court, on appeal, have the power, at any time, to correct a sentence that is illegal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “An illegal sentence is essentially one which either exceeds the relevant statutory maximum limits, violates a defendant's right against double jeopardy, is ambiguous, or is internally contradictory.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.