Madewell v. Downs’s Empirical Analysis
68 F.3d 1030 · 1995
Citation profile
62 federal appellate · 9 district · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 126 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2019 · most notably Jones v. Flowers (2006), Gaming Corporation of America v. Dorsey & Whitney Dorsey & Whitney (1996)
62 federal appellate · 9 district · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 19 U.S.C. § 1602 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 19 U.S.C. § 1607 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 19 U.S.C. § 1608 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 19 U.S.C. § 1609 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 21 U.S.C. § 881 (§ 511 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 903 (§ 708 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co. · Mennonite Board of Missions v. Adams · Golden Pacific Bancorp v. United States · United States v. James Daniel Good Real Property
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 126 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any confusion about Madewell's actual residence was the result of Madewell's own conduct, not the result of a willful failure to send notice to an address the DEA knew or should have known.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(a) The following shall be subject to forfeiture to the United States and no property right shall exist in them: * * * (6) All moneys, negotiable instruments, securities, or other things of value furnished or intended to be furnished by any person in exchange for a controlled substance or listed chemical in violation of this title, all proceeds traceable to such an exchange, and all moneys, negotiable instruments, and securities used or intended to be used to facilitate any violation of this title....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Constructive notice that the [district] court will consider matters outside of the complaint is sufficient. A district court's failure to give formal notice that it will treat a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim as a motion for summary judgment is harmless where the nonmoving party has submitted materials outside of the pleadings in sup~ port of its resistance to a motion to dismiss”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.