Gamble v. Chater’s Empirical Analysis

68 F.3d 319 · 1995

Citation profile

cited by 41 later decisions

July 2017

most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently July 2017 · most notably Albert Shaw v. Shirley S. Chater, as Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (2000), Orn v. Astrue (2007)

11 federal appellate · 3 district ·

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1396A (§ 1902 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Gordon v. Schweiker · Lovelace v. Bowen · Pitzer v. Sullivan · Teter v. Heckler · Tome v. Schweiker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“to use any prosthesis that is reasonably available to him.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. DeChirico v. Callahan · Frank DeCHIRICO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John J. CALLAHAN, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee
“20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1520 (d), 416.920(d) (emphasis added). Because there is no meaningful difference between complications resulting from poor prosthesis fit and complications developing for other reasons, such problems (if they cannot be resolved by the application of a suitable prosthesis that is reasonably available to the claimant) are undeniably”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. DeChirico v. Callahan · Frank DeCHIRICO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John J. CALLAHAN, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee
“[i]nability to use a prosthesis effectively, without obligatory assistive devices, due to one of the following: . . . 3. Stump too short or stump complications persistent, or are expected to persist, for at least 12 months from onset.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Frank DeCHIRICO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John J. CALLAHAN, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee · Puckett v. Chater

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.