Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 68 F.3d 387 - Kepler v. Chater

Kepler v. Chater’s Empirical Analysis

68 F.3d 387 · 1995

Citation profile

313
cited by 313 later decisions
December 2018
most recently cited

60 federal appellate · 91 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 313 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably Hackett v. Barnhart (2005), Qualls v. Apfel (2000)

60 federal appellate · 91 district ·

1650199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Williams v. Bowen · Luna v. Bowen · Thompson v. Sullivan · Hargis v. Sullivan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 313 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the levels of medication and their effectiveness, the extensiveness of the attempts (medical or nonmedical) to obtain relief, the frequency of medical contacts, the nature of daily activities, subjective measures of credibility that are peculiarly within the judgment of the ALJ, the motivation of and relationship between the claimant and other witnesses, and the consistency or compatibility of non-medical testimony with objective medical evidence.”
    21 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Credibility determinations are peculiarly the province of the finder of fact, and we will not upset such determinations when supported by substantial evidence.”
    19 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““We must consider (1) whether Claimant established a pain-producing impairment by objective medical evidence; (2) if so, whether there is a ‘loose nexus’ between the proven impairment and the Claimant’s subjective allegations of pain; and (3) if so, whether considering all the evidence, both objective and subjective, Claimant’s pain is in fact disabling.””
    16 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.