Simon v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 168
Relies on United States v. Nordic Village, Inc. · United States v. Ludey · Massey Motors, Inc. v. United States · Hawkins v. Commissioner · Research Systems Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`property subject to the allowance for depreciation' means property that is subject to exhaustion, wear and tear, or obsolescence”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“reasons other than sound accounting practice,” particularly”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[I]f a taxpayer can prove with reasonable accuracy that an asset used in the trade or business or held for the production of income has a value that wastes over an ascertainable period of time, that asset is depreciable under § 167.... “Whether or not ... a tangible asset, is depreciable for Federal income tax purposes depends upon the determination that the asset is actually exhausting, and that such exhaustion is susceptible of measurement.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.