Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

68 F.3d 461

Docket No. 95-7172.

Milton McCray v. Richard Lanham, Sr., Commissioner Jodie Baker, Commitment Auditor Richard B. Rosenblatt, Assistant Attorney General Marlene Cougar, Commitment Supervisor, Milton McCray v. Warden Smith Attorney General of the State of Maryland

Full caption · 2 consolidated cases

  • Milton McCRAYv.Richard LANHAM, Sr., Commissioner; Jodie Baker, Commitment Auditor; Richard B. Rosenblatt, Assistant Attorney General; Marlene Cougar, Commitment Supervisor
  • Milton McCRAY, Petitioner-v.Warden SMITH; Attorney General of the State of Maryland; Respondents-

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: September 21, 1995. Decided: October 13, 1995.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-10-13

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Tucker v. Lawrence

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-10-13

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Milton McCray, Appellant Pro Se.

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint and his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition, which were consolidated in the district court. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, in No. 95-7172, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McCray v. Lanham, No. CA-95-1830-MJG (D.Md. July 17, 1995). In No. 95-7229, we deny a certificate of probable cause and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. McCray v. Smith, No. CA-95-1906-MJG (D.Md. July 17, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

/68/f3d/461 · .json · Public domain