Sam Friedenberg v. Lane County’s Empirical Analysis
2023
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
September 2024
most recently cited
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Oregon District Court)
Relationships
Applies 1 U.S.C. § 1 (Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002) · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 28 U.S.C. § 1442 · 28 U.S.C. § 1447 · 28 U.S.C. § 2679 · 28 U.S.C. § 517 · 42 U.S.C. § 233 (Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009)
Relies on United States v. Mitchell · John Andrew Cuoco v. Kenneth Moritsugu · Lacey v. Maricopa County · Durham v. Lockheed Martin Corp. · Lively v. Wild Oats Markets, Inc.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.