Ephraim v. Angelone

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided June 27, 2003

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2003-06-27

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 2008

1 district ·

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-06-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Lionell Elijah Ephraim appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Ephraim v. Angelone, No. CA-01-610-2 (E.D.Va. filed Mar. 1, 2003; entered Mar. 3, 2003).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2AFFIRMED.

¶3Because we have received and reviewed the district court record on appeal, we deny Ephraim’s motion for transmittal of the record as unnecessary.