Ivancik v. Wright Aeronautical Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1946
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
November 1954
most recently cited
1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Dioguardi v. Durning · Continental Collieries, Inc. v. Shober · Bryant v. Fissell · Leimer v. State Mut. Life Assur. Co. · Bollinger v. Wagaraw Building Supply Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The complaint must be viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff and ‘so construed as to do substantial justice.’ Rule 8(f) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c; Carroll v. Morrison Hotel Corporation, 7 Cir., 149 F.2d 404, 406 . It is well established that a complaint, viewed and construed according to those standards, should not be dismissed for insufficiency except where it appears to a certainty that the claim for relief therein asserted could not be sustained under any state of facts which could be proved in support of it.” (Citing cases.) Ivancik v. Wright Aeronautical Corporation, above.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wilson v. Eberle
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.