Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 68 FSUPP2D 1169 - Ilick v. Miller

Ilick v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
May 2016
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 2016

4 federal appellate · 2 district ·

40199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3006A (Criminal Justice Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988 · 42 U.S.C. § 1997D · 42 U.S.C. § 1997E

Relies on Blum v. Stenson · Attwood v. Singletary · Gateway Coal Co. v. United Mine Workers · Ed. Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., a Corporation, Richard A. Perkins, Counsel for Ed Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., a Corporation, H. O'Neil Shanks, and Norman Stevans, Richard A. Perkins, Counsel For · Bill Martin Director Michigan Department of Correctionss v. Everett Hadix

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[s]uch a finding, however, appears to be unnecessary, for it is 'the alteration of the defendant’s activity which is the goal of the lawsuit. Detailed examination of the vehicle of the change in that behavior is less important than the fact that the change has occurred. Any other rule would exalt form over substance. The plaintiffs have achieved their goal by causing a significant alteration [of] the defendants’ use of force and mental health treatment policies.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he PLRA sets the payment rate as 150% of the rate “established” by the CJA in 18 U.S.C. § 3006A. It does not limit payment of fees to 150% of the CJA payments actually “paid” or “awarded.” The critical word is “established.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “prior section 1988 law applies to all fees billed up to the effective date of the PLRA (i.e., April 26, 1996), and that the PLRA fee cap applies to all fees billed after that date”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.