Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

68 Ga. 818

Paschal v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 15, 1882

Supreme Court of Georgia · decided 1882-02-15

<p>Where an indictment charged the commission of an assault with intent to commit murder by using a weapon likely to produce death, the proof must show that such was the character of the weapon. This may be done by producing the instrument itself, or showing the effect of it, or other satisfactory evidence, but must be done in some way. Code, §4359; 57 Ga., 107; 59 Ib., 638; 32 Ib., 672; 50 Ib., 591.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1882-02-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently October 1985 · most notably Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Young (1888), Standard Oil Co. v. Reagan (1915)

1 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

5018821890190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Jackson, Chief Justice.

¶1[Allen Paschal was indicted for assault with intent to murder, “ with a certain stick, loaded at the end with lead, said stick being a weapon likely to produce death.” On the trial, the only evidence as to the nature of the weapon used by defendant was as follows : One witness testified *819that he had seen defendant some three years ago with a stick which was loaded with lead. Another testified, that in the act of striking, “ the head of the stick shined like a silver dollar,” the alleged assault having been committed on a “ star-light night.” A witness for the defence testified that the defendant was accustomed to walking with an ordinary hickory stick, weighing not more than a pound. Defendant admitted the fact of striking with a stick, but pleaded not guilty to the offence as' charged in the indictment.

¶2Counsel for the defence requested the court to charge the jury that “ where the indictment charges the defendant with the offence of assault with intent to murder by using a stick, an instrument likely to produce death, then it is incumbent on the state to- prove the allegations.” The request was refused ; defendant was found guilty, and excepted.]

/68/ga/818 · .json · Public domain