Slotin & Co. v. Eiseman

Decided September 24, 1942

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 1959

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1942-09-24

Sutton, J.

¶1There being no assignment of error in the bill of exceptions on any final judgment of the court in this case, this court is without jurisdiction to entertain it, and the writ of error is hereby dismissed. Blackwell v. State, 46 Ga. App. 830 (169 S. E. 507); Moyers v. State, 59 Ga. App. 875 (2 S. E. 2d, 517) ; Hicks v. Community Loan &c. Co., 62 Ga. App. 909 (10 S. E. 2d, 226); Empire Cotton-Oil Co. v. Taylor, 152 Ga. 693 (111 S. E. 35); Bearden v. Longino, 181 Ga. 807 (184 S. E. 319); Jordan v. Harber, 182 Ga. 621 (186 S. E. 670); Davis v. State, 191 Ga. 558 (13 S. E. 2d, 351).

¶2Writ of error dismissed.

Stephens, P. J., and Felton, J., concur.Hugh B. Kimbrough, for plaintiffs in error.J. D. Kirkland, J. Paul Dekle, contra.