Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 68 Idaho 173 - State v. Dickens

State v. Dickens’s Empirical Analysis

1948

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
June 2021
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 2021

9 state decisions

30194819501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Taylor · McQueary v. People · Morse v. Ward · State v. Moon · McAllister v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t plainly appears, that the practical result of the disallowance by the court of defendant's challenge for cause . . . was to contract the number of peremptory challenges to which he was entitled, and that such an error may have been seriously prejudicial to defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Proof beyond a reasonable doubt” is proof that leaves you with an abiding conviction of the truth of the charge against the defendant. An abiding conviction is one that would make an ordinary person willing to act in the most important affairs of his or her own life.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.