People v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 43 Ill. 2d 375 - The PEOPLE v. Nuccio · 73 Ill. 2d 204 - People v. Lutz · 45 Ill. App. 3d 441 - People v. Goolsby · 54 Ill. 2d 33 - People v. Moore · 41 Ill. App. 3d 215 - People v. Meints
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““To sustain the charge of aggravated battery, the State must prove the following propositions: FIRST: That the defendant knowingly or intentionally made physical contact of an insulting or provoking nature with Harold Allen; and SECOND: That the defendant knew Harold Allen to be a correctional officer engaged in the execution of an official duty. ***””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Jones
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.