People v. Kellogg’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

cited by 5 later decisions

states following

September 1980

most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc. · 11 Ill. 2d 360 - The People v. Burson · 56 Ill. 2d 187 - People v. Manzella · 46 Ill. App. 3d 1010 - People v. Dees · 16 Ill. App. 3d 29 - Goshey v. Dunlap

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

““TELE CLERK: Susan M. Vesecky, was this then and is this now your verdict? JUROR VESECKY: Yes. Can I change my vote? TELE COURT: The question is, was this then and is this now your verdict? JUROR VESECKY: (No response.) THE COURT: Was this then and is this now your verdict? JUROR VESECKY: Yes, sir.” 68 Ill. App. 3d 456, 457-58 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. 76 Ill. 2d 274 - People v. Preston · 77 Ill. 2d 524 - People v. Kellogg
““THE COURT: Is this and was this your verdict? JUROR: Well, it wasn’t exactly, no. THE COURT: Did you sign this? JUROR: Yes, I did. THE COURT: Then it’s your verdict.” 9 Ill. App. 3d 209, 210 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. 76 Ill. 2d 274 - People v. Preston

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.