Krutz v. Griffith’s Empirical Analysis
1879
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently April 1949
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jeffersonville, Madison, & Indianapolis R. R. v. Hendricks · Whittem v. State · Shattuck v. Myers · Redman v. State · Truitt v. Truitt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Seventh. When either party shall make and file an affidavit of the bias, prejudice, or interest of the judge before whom the said cause is pending.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Hunt v. State · Burkett v. Holman““The affidavit for a change of venue or of trial from the judge shall state that the party is informed and believes that he has a good cause of action or defense; and, if a defendant, in general terms, the character of the defense. The affiant shall likewise state that the application is not made for delay.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hunt v. State““Said courts shall adopt rules for conducting the business therein not repugnant to the laws of this state.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.