State v. Borchert’s Empirical Analysis
1904
Citation profile
34 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently August 2021 · most notably State v. Clements (1987), State v. Schifsky (1955)
34 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Markins · State v. Potter · McCutchen v. Loggins · Tilley v. Montelius Piano Co. · State v. Stevens
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““There is nothing in the record to justify the contention that the effect of the judge’s conduct was to hold out to the jury as an inducement to a verdict of guilty an implied promise that leniency would be shown in fixing the punishment.” (p. 366.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Evans““The jury merely inquired in advance whether a verdict with the extraneous matter would be received, and the judge, having authority to accept it or refuse it, chose to accept it, and notified the jury that it would do so.” (p. 366.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Evans
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.