Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 68 Md. App. 168 - Watson v. State

68 Md. App. 168 - Watson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
February 1990
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In re Disbarment of Allison · Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Public Service Commission · Dutton v. State · Von Lusch v. State · 53 Md. App. 171 - Walker v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In evaluating whether foreign convictions are “crimes of violence” as required by the statute, a two step process has evolved. First, we determine whether the Maryland counterpart to the foreign crime is one of those classified in the statute as a “crime of violence.” See DiBartolomeo v. State, 61 Md.App. 302, 312-13 [ 486 A.2d 256 ] (1985); Mitchell v. State, 56 Md.App. 162, 183-84 [ 467 A.2d 522 ] (1983). Once it is determined that the counterpart Maryland offense is among those set out in the statute, we then look to the law of the foreign jurisdiction for its definition of that crime. If the elements of the crime as established by the foreign jurisdiction are suffi ciently limited to those elements by which the crime is established in this State, it qualifies as a violent crime under our statute. Temoney v. State, 290 Md. 251, 262-64 [ 429 A.2d 1018 ] (1981); DiBartolomeo, 61 Md.App. at 312-13 [ 486 A.2d 256 ]. If the crime meets both classification and definition requirements, it may be used for the purposes of applying the enhanced punishment statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.