Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 68 MDAPP 242 - Rypma v. Stehr

Rypma v. Stehr’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
April 2011
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently April 2011

8 state decisions

401986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hughes Tool Co. v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. · Maryland v. Baltimore Radio Show, Inc. · Houghton v. County Comm'rs of Kent Co. · Farmers & Merchants National Bank v. Schlossberg · Winterwerp v. Allstate Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When does custody jurisdiction of a Maryland court attach when the Uniform Act does not apply, and when Maryland jurisdiction is unimpeded by the prior or existing competing jurisdiction of another state?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We emphasize the limited nature of this holding. As we have said, it is based on the “unique facts” of this case — notably the lack of any evidence of custody proceedings pending in Iowa.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.