68 Md. App. 41 - Bright v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 2015
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Williams v. United States · Lewis v. State · Poole v. State · Couser v. State · Kelly v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[w]e must look at the facts and circumstances surrounding the court’s response to such a request [for self-representation with assistance of counsel]. If the totality of circumstances indicate a defendant was granted the right to retain the assistance of counsel while assuming a role in his or her own defense, even though the court may term the right granted one of ‘self-representation,’ the exact assistance granted may still be one of hybrid representation.” Id. at 47 , 509 A.2d at 1230 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Parren v. State“Since appellants contend that they would have used the adjustment hearing transcript for impeachment purposes, ... the evidence did not qualify as “newly discovered. ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.