Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 68 MDAPP 553 - Hamlet v. State

Hamlet v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
July 1997
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Johnson v. Zerbst · North Carolina v. Alford · Brady v. United States · MacHibroda v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]e see no intrinsic constitutional infirmity in broadening plea negotiations so as to permit third party beneficiaries.... Recognizing, however, that threats to prosecute third persons can carry leverage wholly unrelated to the validity of the underlying charge, we think that prosecutors who choose to use that technique must observe a high standard of good faith.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.