Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 68 MICH 246 - McMorran v. Murphy

McMorran v. Murphy’s Empirical Analysis

1888

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 1945
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently May 1945

4 state decisions

201888189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We think the court was right in this direction. The evidence is undisputed that no part of the $7,000 or $8,000 notes were paid in fact. The notes finally given in place of them must be considered as renewals of the original ones.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “—“were in renewal of the notes for similar amounts mentioned in the agreement, the giving of the notes as such renewals would not amount to a payment, and plaintiffs should recover.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.