In Re Wright’s Empirical Analysis
1951
Citation profile
26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently April 2005 · most notably State Bar of Nevada v. Claiborne (1988), In Re Discipline of Drakulich (1995)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Werner v. State Bar · In Re Shattuck · Fish v. the State Bar · Furman v. State Bar · Herron v. State Bar
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Entrapment is the seduction or improper inducement to commit a crime for the purpose of instituting a criminal prosecution, but if a person in good faith and for the purpose of detecting or discovering a crime or offense, furnishes the opportunity for the commission thereof by one who has the requisite criminal intent, it is not entrapment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Moore v. State · Oliver v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.