¶1OPINION OF THE COURT
¶2On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed for reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (115 AD2d 751). Unlike People v Briggins (50 NY2d 302), there was here a fraudulent intent.
¶3Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr.